azpainter: update to 3.0.12#60098
Conversation
|
Half passing half failing. I'll look into this. |
|
No I think I'm dumb. I removed the patch file because it compiles fine without it on x86_64 which is my build environment. |
2abcc22 to
3ea677b
Compare
|
The patch file is outdated. Removing it will only fix x86_64 builds. |
|
I will need to write a new patch file. |
cf2c3e3 to
5dbeff3
Compare
|
All builds now pass so I'll switch this to open. There are probably things that can be improved here and I'll work on them. |
|
I figured there would be many issues. |
|
The readme confused me. It said "This software is released under the GPL3 License." Looking at the files I see that they do specifiy or later. I was focused on the configure section so I didn't notice. |
|
Looks much cleaner now. I spent all day yesterday and the day before working on this which is why the code is terrible and includes a bunch of redundant stuff. I didn't have time to review it. |
|
I've also noticed theres no changelog. I'll add that. |
|
Alright well I'm not even sure if it can be moved to the do_configure function. It might have to stay in do_build. |
|
The current code looks about as clean as it's going to get. azpainter is just built in a way that we have to do strange stuff like this. |
ffe0c9e to
aa7f16a
Compare
Co-authored-by: Duncaen <duncaen@voidlinux.org>
Testing the changes
Local build testing
Patch file does not appear to be necessary anymore. Additionally, the license is GPL-3.0 only not GPL-3.0 or later.