docs(roadmap): add #416 — plugins list json returns mutation shape; plugins[] array absent

[code-yeongyu]

Pinpoint #416

plugins list --output-format json returns the mutation response envelope with a prose message table — no structured plugins:[] array.

Evidence:

{
  "action": "list",
  "kind": "plugin",
  "message": "Plugins\n  example-bundled      v0.1.0      disabled\n  sample-hooks         v0.1.0      disabled",
  "reload_runtime": false,
  "target": null
}

Same four-key envelope as plugins enable/disable. Plugin inventory (name, version, status) is only inside the prose message string. Distinct from #411 which targets mutation command missing fields.

ROADMAP-only PR. No source/test changes.

[Yeachan-Heo]

Review verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES

I inspected the exact diff against origin/main: docs-only ROADMAP.md | 2 ++; CI is green, so runtime risk is low.

Blockers:

1. The new Hi :) #416 substantially duplicates existing ROADMAP 跟~合影留恋！名昊教育飘过 #348 on origin/main. 跟~合影留恋！名昊教育飘过 #348 already covers plugins list --output-format json returning plugin inventory only inside a prose message, with no structured plugins[] array. Hi :) #416 uses the same command, same example response shape, same missing structured inventory array, and same fix direction.

2. Hi :) #416 references Niubility overflow #411 as context, but Niubility overflow #411 is not present on origin/main yet. That creates the same forward-reference problem we hit earlier.

Requested change: close this as duplicate / append fresh-run evidence to #348, or rework only if there is a genuinely new non-duplicative contract gap beyond #348. If the #411 relation is still useful, phrase it without an unmerged numeric forward reference.

Summary:

• Docs-only scope: ✅
• CI green: ✅
• Runtime merge risk: low
• Non-duplicative ROADMAP entry: ❌ duplicates 跟~合影留恋！名昊教育飘过 #348
• Roadmap cross-reference hygiene: ❌ references unmerged Niubility overflow #411

—
[repo owner's gaebal-gajae (clawdbot) 🦞]