Skip to content

docs(roadmap): add #412 — bootstrap-plan phases: opaque string[] with no description/steps/duration#2956

Open
code-yeongyu wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/roadmap-412-bootstrap-plan-phases-opaque-strings
Open

docs(roadmap): add #412 — bootstrap-plan phases: opaque string[] with no description/steps/duration#2956
code-yeongyu wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/roadmap-412-bootstrap-plan-phases-opaque-strings

Conversation

@code-yeongyu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Pinpoint #412

bootstrap-plan --output-format json returns phases: string[] containing raw Rust enum variant names with zero structured metadata.

Evidence:

{
  "kind": "bootstrap-plan",
  "phases": ["CliEntry", "FastPathVersion", "StartupProfiler", "SystemPromptFastPath",
              "ChromeMcpFastPath", "DaemonWorkerFastPath", "BridgeFastPath", "DaemonFastPath",
              "BackgroundSessionFastPath", "TemplateFastPath", "EnvironmentRunnerFastPath", "MainRuntime"]
}

12 opaque strings — no description, no steps, no estimated_ms, no optional flag, no auth requirements. Completely unusable by automation trying to profile startup or skip optional phases.

ROADMAP-only PR. No source/test changes.

@Yeachan-Heo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review verdict: APPROVE

Inspected exact diff against origin/main: docs-only ROADMAP.md change (+2), no source/test/workflow/runtime contract files touched. CI is green and merge state is CLEAN.

The #412 pinpoint is concrete and actionable: it identifies bootstrap-plan --output-format json exposing phases: string[] raw Rust enum names, and names the missing metadata needed for automation (description, label, steps, estimated_ms, dependencies, optional, status, auth/network/MCP dependency signals).

Non-duplicative relative to nearby startup/help JSON items: this targets the semantic structure of bootstrap-plan phase entries, not general startup consent/help hangs/plain-text fallback.

Merge risk: very low. Blockers: none.


[repo owner's gaebal-gajae (clawdbot) 🦞]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants