chore: add GautamBytes to vouch list

[ericallam]

Adds @GautamBytes to the vouch list so they can contribute to the repository.

Closes #3307

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4820205

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: cc5e76db-5af6-4511-8da6-cb8c10919fdb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d205955 and 4820205.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .vouch.yml

📜 Recent review details

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (32)

• GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 8)
• GitHub Check: units / e2e-webapp / 🧪 E2E Tests: Webapp
• GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
• GitHub Check: sdk-compat / Node.js 20.20 (ubuntu-latest)
• GitHub Check: sdk-compat / Node.js 22.12 (ubuntu-latest)
• GitHub Check: sdk-compat / Bun Runtime
• GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
• GitHub Check: sdk-compat / Deno Runtime
• GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
• GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
• GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
• GitHub Check: sdk-compat / Cloudflare Workers
• GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
• GitHub Check: audit
• GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
• GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
• GitHub Check: Analyze (python)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (2)

📚 Learning: 2026-04-13T21:43:58.707Z

Learnt from: ericallam
Repo: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev PR: 3368
File: apps/webapp/app/services/taskIdentifierRegistry.server.ts:49-58
Timestamp: 2026-04-13T21:43:58.707Z
Learning: In `apps/webapp/app/services/taskIdentifierRegistry.server.ts` (and closely related task registry/sync code in this module), an empty deployment (zero tasks) is not a realistic/expected scenario. Do not flag or require special handling or fallback logic for missing empty-task cases in this registry/sync flow.

Applied to files:

• .vouch.yml

📚 Learning: 2026-04-23T13:26:27.529Z

Learnt from: ericallam
Repo: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev PR: 3430
File: apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/RunStreamPresenter.server.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-04-23T13:26:27.529Z
Learning: In this codebase’s SSE implementation (notably `apps/webapp/app/utils/sse.ts` and its SSE callers such as `apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/RunStreamPresenter.server.ts`), do not treat `.abort()` vs `.abort("<reason string>")` differences as a heap retention/memory leak issue on Node 20. Heap deltas are identical once `AbortSignal.any` is not involved; the investigated SSE memory leak root cause was `AbortSignal.any` (via FinalizationRegistry behavior on abort). When reviewing, focus on whether `AbortSignal.any` (or similar signal-combining/finalization patterns) is used in the SSE abort path rather than the presence/contents of the abort reason string. Named abort-reason sentinel constants (e.g., `ABORT_REASON_*`) are for readability/style only, not correctness.

Applied to files:

• .vouch.yml

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.vouch.yml (1)

1-4: LGTM — valid YAML vouch list update

The new github: GautamBytes entry is correctly indented under vouch: and matches the existing entry format. No further changes needed.

---

Walkthrough

The .vouch.yml configuration file is updated to add a new entry for GautamBytes to the existing vouching configuration, which already contains an entry for edosrecki. This is a single-line addition to the configuration file with no modifications to code logic or existing entries.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	The description is minimal but covers the essential information. It lacks the required template sections (checklist, testing details, changelog, screenshots) but provides the core objective and issue reference.	Consider following the repository's PR template more closely by adding the checklist and testing sections to ensure consistency with contribution guidelines.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: adding GautamBytes to the vouch list to enable contributions.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The PR satisfies issue #3307 by adding GautamBytes to the vouch list, enabling them to contribute and prepare their planned fix for TRI-8310.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The change is narrowly scoped to the vouch configuration only, directly addressing the vouch request without introducing unrelated modifications.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch claude/issue-3307-20260424-1347

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[devin-ai-integration]

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.