Skip to content

fix: clarify reclaim condition on redpanda_memory_allocated_memory#1687

Merged
micheleRP merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/memory-allocated-reclaim-nit
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

fix: clarify reclaim condition on redpanda_memory_allocated_memory#1687
micheleRP merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/memory-allocated-reclaim-nit

Conversation

@micheleRP
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@micheleRP micheleRP commented Apr 28, 2026

Summary

Preview pages

Test plan

  • git diff shows only the intended one-word addition in modules/reference/pages/public-metrics-reference.adoc
  • CI (link checker, lint) green
  • Reviewer confirms wording

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add "if needed" so the description of the batch cache reclaim behavior
is technically accurate. Follow-up to PR #1656 addressing post-merge
review nit from @bharathv:
#1656 (comment)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@micheleRP micheleRP requested a review from a team as a code owner April 28, 2026 21:59
@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify Bot commented Apr 28, 2026

Deploy Preview for redpanda-docs-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4b67212
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/redpanda-docs-preview/deploys/69f12dca43271a0008a4a23b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1687--redpanda-docs-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 28, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the documentation for the redpanda_memory_allocated_memory metric in the public metrics reference. The change modifies the description of reclaimable batch cache memory to clarify that it is reclaimable "if needed" rather than unconditionally reclaimable. This is a single-line documentation clarification with no impact on code or functionality.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • bharathv
  • tyson-redpanda
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: clarifying the reclaim condition in documentation for a specific metric.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description check ✅ Passed PR description includes summary, preview link, and test plan checklist. Missing required Jira ticket reference and review deadline from template.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/memory-allocated-reclaim-nit

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@micheleRP micheleRP merged commit f51dc1f into main Apr 29, 2026
7 checks passed
@micheleRP micheleRP deleted the fix/memory-allocated-reclaim-nit branch April 29, 2026 00:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants