Add practical examples and documentation for PyIceberg#3292
Open
nellaivijay wants to merge 5 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Open
Add practical examples and documentation for PyIceberg#3292nellaivijay wants to merge 5 commits intoapache:mainfrom
nellaivijay wants to merge 5 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
This commit adds comprehensive practical examples and documentation to help users get started with PyIceberg: New Example Notebooks: - duckdb_integration_example.ipynb: DuckDB integration for high-performance analytics - csv_migration_example.ipynb: CSV to Iceberg migration strategies - time_travel_example.ipynb: Time travel queries and snapshot management New Documentation: - practical-examples.md: Guide for running and using practical examples - migration-guide.md: Comprehensive guide for migrating from various formats to Iceberg - troubleshooting.md: Common issues and solutions for PyIceberg users Updated Documentation: - SUMMARY.md: Added new documentation files to the table of contents These additions provide real-world examples and guidance for common PyIceberg use cases, making it easier for users to adopt and use PyIceberg effectively.
This commit adds comprehensive practical examples and documentation to help users get started with PyIceberg: New Example Notebooks: - csv_migration_example.ipynb: CSV to Iceberg migration strategies - time_travel_example.ipynb: Time travel queries and snapshot management New Documentation: - practical-examples.md: Guide for running and using practical examples - migration-guide.md: Comprehensive guide for migrating from various formats to Iceberg - troubleshooting.md: Common issues and solutions for PyIceberg users Updated Documentation: - SUMMARY.md: Added new documentation files to the table of contents These additions provide real-world examples and guidance for common PyIceberg use cases, making it easier for users to adopt and use PyIceberg effectively.
- Fixed duplicate heading in migration-guide.md (Validation -> Post-Migration Validation) - Removed specific notebook references from documentation to avoid link issues - Fixed Jupyter notebook schema validation by adding missing outputs field - Fixed import organization in notebooks by moving all imports to top cell - Removed duplicate imports from cleanup cells - Fixed end-of-file formatting issues All linting checks now pass. Generated with [Devin](https://cli.devin.ai/docs) Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit adds comprehensive practical examples and documentation to help users get started with PyIceberg:
New Example Notebooks:
New Documentation:
Updated Documentation:
These additions provide real-world examples and guidance for common PyIceberg use cases, making it easier for users to adopt and use PyIceberg effectively.
Rationale for this change
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?