While building various sd-server and sd-cli binaries using different container ROCm base images, I noticed in some cases that the steps generation time of images were faster.
What I found is that when I used ghcr.io/ggml-org/llama.cpp:light-rocm as a base to build sd-server, the image generation was 50% faster than when I used rocm/dev-ubuntu-24.04:7.2
Then I switched to rocm/dev-ubuntu-24.04:7.2.1 and I got the same speed as the ggml llama.cpp base image.
Since it seems that the provided binaries of stable-diffusion on github also uses docker.io/rocm/dev-ubuntu-24.04:7.2, would it not make sense to switch to 7.2.1 since it seems significantly faster?
Because I have noticed the same slower speed with the pre-build binaries compared to the one I am building.
I originally thought these were both pointing at the same (7.2 should pull 7.2.1?), but apparently that does not seem to be the case. Or perhaps the issue is more complicated and related to my runtime image which was always based on 7.2.1 and this has to match...
While building various sd-server and sd-cli binaries using different container ROCm base images, I noticed in some cases that the steps generation time of images were faster.
What I found is that when I used ghcr.io/ggml-org/llama.cpp:light-rocm as a base to build sd-server, the image generation was 50% faster than when I used rocm/dev-ubuntu-24.04:7.2
Then I switched to rocm/dev-ubuntu-24.04:7.2.1 and I got the same speed as the ggml llama.cpp base image.
Since it seems that the provided binaries of stable-diffusion on github also uses docker.io/rocm/dev-ubuntu-24.04:7.2, would it not make sense to switch to 7.2.1 since it seems significantly faster?
Because I have noticed the same slower speed with the pre-build binaries compared to the one I am building.
I originally thought these were both pointing at the same (7.2 should pull 7.2.1?), but apparently that does not seem to be the case. Or perhaps the issue is more complicated and related to my runtime image which was always based on 7.2.1 and this has to match...